首页> 外文OA文献 >The role of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) in information and communication in science. A conceptual framework and empirical study
【2h】

The role of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) in information and communication in science. A conceptual framework and empirical study

机译:新的信息和通信技术(ICT)在科学信息和通信中的作用。概念框架和实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ProblemThis dissertation presents a literature-based framework for communication in science (with the elements partners, purposes, message, and channel), which it then applies in and amends through an empirical study of how geoscientists use two social computing technologies (SCTs), blogging and Twitter (both general use and tweeting from conferences). How are these technologies used and what value do scientists derive from them?MethodThe empirical part used a two-pronged qualitative study, using (1) purposive samples of ~400 blog posts and ~1000 tweets and (2) a purposive sample of 8 geoscientist interviews. Blog posts, tweets, and interviews were coded using the framework, adding new codes as needed. The results were aggregated into 8 geoscientist case studies, and general patterns were derived through cross-case analysis.ResultsA detailed picture of how geoscientists use blogs and twitter emerged, including a number of new functions not served by traditional channels. Some highlights: Geoscientists use SCTs for communication among themselves as well as with the public. Blogs serve persuasion and personal knowledge management; Twitter often amplifies the signal of traditional communications such as journal articles. Blogs include tutorials for peers, reviews of basic science concepts, and book reviews. Twitter includes links to readings, requests for assistance, and discussions of politics and religion. Twitter at conferences provides live coverage of sessions. ConclusionsBoth blogs and Twitter are routine parts of scientists' communication toolbox, blogs for in-depth, well-prepared essays, Twitter for faster and broader interactions. Both have important roles in supporting community building, mentoring, and learning and teaching. The Framework of Communication in Science was a useful tool in studying these two SCTs in this domain. The results should encourage science administrators to facilitate SCT use of scientists in their organization and information providers to search SCT documents as an important source of information.
机译:问题本论文提出了一个基于文献的科学交流框架(包括合作伙伴,目的,信息和渠道要素),然后将其应用于对地球科学家如何使用两种社会计算技术(SCT)的实证研究并进行了修正,博客和Twitter(常规使用和会议推文)。这些技术如何使用以及科学家从中获得什么价值方法方法本经验部分使用了两方面的定性研究,使用(1)约400个博客帖子和约1000条推文的目的样本,以及(2)8个地球科学家的目的样本面试使用该框架对博客文章,推文和访谈进行了编码,并根据需要添加了新代码。结果汇总到8个地球科学家案例研究中,并通过跨案例分析得出了一般模式。结果出现了关于地球科学家如何使用博客和Twitter的详细信息,包括许多传统渠道无法提供的新功能。一些重点:地学家使用SCT在彼此之间以及与公众之间进行通信。博客服务于说服和个人知识管理; Twitter通常会放大期刊文章等传统交流的信号。博客包括针对同伴的教程,基本科学概念的评论和书评。 Twitter包含阅读链接,寻求帮助以及政治和宗教讨论的链接。会议上的Twitter提供会议的实时报道。结论博客和Twitter都是科学家交流工具箱的常规组成部分,博客用于深入,准备充分的论文,而Twitter则用于更快,更广泛的交互。两者在支持社区建设,指导以及学与教方面都起着重要作用。科学交流框架是研究此领域中这两个SCT的有用工具。结果应鼓励科学管理人员促进SCT在其组织和信息提供者中使用科学家,以搜索SCT文档作为重要的信息来源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pikas, Christina Kirk;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号